home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Turnbull China Bikeride
/
Turnbull China Bikeride - Disc 2.iso
/
BARNET
/
ARMLINUX
/
MAIL
/
9710
/
000000_pb@nexus.co.uk _Wed Oct 1 09:32:05 1997.msg
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1997-11-30
|
1KB
Return-Path: <pb@nexus.co.uk>
Received: from globe (nexusel.demon.co.uk [158.152.30.195])
by odie.barnet.ac.uk (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id JAA22184
for <willy@odie.barnet.ac.uk>; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 09:31:59 +0100
Received: from spring.nexus.co.uk [192.0.0.3] (exim)
by globe with smtp (Exim 1.62 #1)
id 0xGK4b-00059X-00; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 09:23:58 +0100
Received: from spring.nexus.co.uk [127.0.0.1] (pb)
by spring.nexus.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.62 #1)
id 0xGK4E-0008D7-00; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 09:23:34 +0100
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@odie.barnet.ac.uk>
cc: olof.backing@netinsight.se (Olof Backing), linux-arm@vger.rutgers.edu
Subject: Re: What libc in ARM Linux?
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 29 Sep 1997 15:16:31 BST."
<199709291416.PAA07422@odie.barnet.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 09:23:34 +0100
From: Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>
Message-Id: <E0xGK4E-0008D7-00@spring.nexus.co.uk>
Status: RO
In message <199709291416.PAA07422@odie.barnet.ac.uk>, Matthew Wilcox writes:
>libc 4. Since we do not yet have ELF, libc 5 is a no-go. Though, since
>we wll presumably skip libc 5 and move straight to libc 6 once we do have
>ELF, a case could be made for doing an a.out libc 5. It all depends if
>someone feels it's worth the effort. It probably isn't.
I think the effort would be better spent on doing an a.out libc6.
p.